بهبود جامع - CQI360

بهبود کسب و کار - CQI360

بهبود جامع - CQI360

بهبود کسب و کار - CQI360

بهبود جامع - CQI360

This Blog Will Introduce Valuable Guide In C.Q.I, Strategy, Performance And Improve Business In Iran And The World
Hope To Improve.
Any Company In The World Can Have Free Introduce About Himself And His Product By Contact With Me
این وبلاگ قصد معرفی و آموزش نکات ارزشمند در حوزه بهبود و ارتقا کسب و کار در سازمان های ایرانی و خارجی را دارد.
باشد که تغییری حاصل شود.

طبقه بندی موضوعی
نویسندگان

۷ مطلب در تیر ۱۳۹۸ ثبت شده است

 

 

با سلام

 

 

بنده احمدی هستم و جهت مشاوره، و برگزاری دوره همراه با صدور گواهی نامه معتبر  در موارد ذیل در خدمت شما هستم:

 

1-  جایزه تعالی (EFQM و INQA)

 

 

2-  استراتژی و کارت امتیازی متوازن (BSC)

 

 

3-    بهبود کسب و کار

 

4- مشاوره سیستم های مدیریتی (ISO)  و اخذ گواهینامه از سوی شرکت های معتبر:

 

 

IMQ

 

 

TUV NORD

 

 

TUV INTERCERT

 

 

MIC

 

 

NISCERT

 

 

DQS

 

 

SGS

 

 

 

در خدمت شما هستم

 

 

09125468950

 

 

احمدی

 

 

Hi

 

 

I can consult and train below item in your business:

 

 

1-   Management systems (ISO)

 

 

2-   Excellence models (EFQM)

 

 

3-   Strategy and BSC

 

 

4-   Business performance improvement

0098-9125468950

 

 

 

  • amir ahmadi

با سلام

شما میتوانید با تماس با بنده جهت برگزاری دوره های آموزشی و مشاوره ذیل اقدام بفرمایید:

استراتژی و ارزیابی عملکرد (BSC)

مدل تعالی EFQM 

دوره های مرتبط با مشتری (CRM,10002,1000,4 و....)  می توانید با شماره مستقیم بنده در تماس باشید 

با تشکر

احمدی

09125468950

  • amir ahmadi

After expending considerable effort on formulating a strategy, most executives would like to see their company’s strategic plans fully executed. Deviations from the strategic plan are often assumed to be detrimental to corporate performance. However, compliance with the strategy doesn’t necessarily correlate directly to performance.

The gap between strategy and the execution of that strategy is often referred to as “strategic dissonance.” We like to call it “strategic stress.” The “Yerkes-Dodson Law,” which has been used in research that examines the relationship between stress and individual performance, shows that stress increases performance up to a certain point, but not beyond that point. In a similar vein, “strategic stress” can improve your company’s performance – up until a point.

W171115_PEDERSEN_THESTRATEGIC




 

Strategic stress is characterized by three zones, which executives must consider and effectively manage:

Strategic Burnout (too much strategic stress). Excessive strategic stress is typically a result of one or more of the following causes: (1) Too much autonomy, i.e. employees that follow their own agendas at the expense of corporate alignment (2) unrealistic strategic plans, i.e. the organization is not able to live up to the plans put forth by top management, and (3) market dynamics, i.e. external developments that push the organization in other directions than what was initially planned. When strategy execution moves too far away from the initial strategy, the link between the plan and reality is broken, resources are wasted, and the organization lacks guidance. This scenario is characterized by many divergent projects, fragmented activities that have little in common with the initial strategic plan, and projects that do not fit together. The outcomes of such anarchy are random and, as such, unpredictable. Such organizations experience strategic burnout. Strategic burnout can occur if prophets and experts (that is, employees who enthusiastically work on projects outside the predefined strategy) dominate the organization without the counterweight of executors and gamblers, who drive projects related to the planned strategy (here, executors implement low-risk strategic projects, and gamblers bet on high-risk  projects that are within the confines of the predefined strategy).

INSIGHT CENTER

An example of strategic burnout can be found at Lego around 2004. The company had expanded into too many different and overly complex projects, which essentially created high levels of strategic stress. The multitude of projects drove the company in numerous directions at the same time. The resulting complexity was an underlying cause of the company’s strategic burnout. A turnaround subsequently lowered strategic stress to a productive level by discontinuing many of their seemingly unrelated projects, re-focusing on their core business, as well as streamlining operational processes that improved coordination activities.

Strategic Boredom (not enough strategic stress). When strategy execution aligns perfectly with initial plans, the organization does not experience sufficient strategic stress. This results in strategic boredom. The concept of strategic boredom does not necessarily suggest that the content of the strategy is boring, but that the conformity and limited challenges give rise to the risk of strategic complacency, which may result in rigid execution that is blind to emerging risks or opportunities. Strategic boredom can occur if executors and gamblers dominate the organization without the counterweight of prophets and experts who push for new ways to drive the business.

An example of strategic boredom is illustrated in Clayton Christensen’s famous work on the disk-drive industry. Leading disk-drive manufacturers found it nearly impossible to maintain their success when the technology and market structure began to change. In other words, their previous success meant that employees failed to challenge the once-successful strategy—that strategy was instead challenged by new market entrants.

Strategic Sweet Spot (just the right amount of strategic stress). When strategy execution differs moderately from the initial plan, the organization is in the strategic sweet spot. This scenario is characterized by a sufficient balance between alignment and nonconformity, which is needed to ensure strategic success. The sweet spot can be reached if there is a balance among the four project-manager types: executors, experts, gamblers, and prophets. The optimal amount of each will depend on the specific organization and the situation, and on changes in technologies, customer needs, and the competitive context.

An example of the strategic sweet spot is documented in Gary Hamel’s study of a gang of unlikely rebels who woke IBM up in time to catch the internet wave. Certain project leaders at IBM started an initiative to build a community of web fans, i.e. early adopters of the web, that would subsequently transform the company. The group developed an internal “Get Connected” manifesto that helped guide and leverage the web at IBM. Moreover, a variety of popular, public websites for sports events were developed to illustrate the potential of the novel technological development. The strategic stress generated by these employees was enough to change the organization while not moving it too far away from its original strategic domain.

What can you as a leader do to ensure that your strategy is experiencing just the right amount of stress? We suggest the following:

  • Adopt a mindset for stress: Make sure that you do not view strategic stress as a problem from the outset—you want your strategy to be subjected to some stress. Therefore, emphasize the value of both challenging and executing the strategy when communicating with your employees.
  • Set up for stress: Proactively think about how emerging autonomous projects can influence your strategy and its execution. Build structures and processes in the organization such as hackathons and innovation days that provide one-day bursts of autonomy to enable employees to experiment with alternative projects. By providing a clearly limited space for employee autonomy, you ensure that you won’t step into the “too many different projects” pitfall, potentially leading to a strategic burnout.
  • Diversify for stress: Employ a mix of people so that your organization can carry out different projects, some of which focus on executing the strategic plan and others that challenge that plan.

Strategy making involves both the deliberate execution of intentional plans and responsive actions to emerging issues. Both activities are necessary to ensure strategic success and corporate longevity. Therefore, your strategy needs a level of stress that requires you to cope with the gap between the plan and its execution.

Too much stress to your strategy can be detrimental; but a sufficient amount of strategic stress ensures that your organization moves forward efficiently, and keeps you alert and responsive to emerging developments. Just like a diamond is the valuable outcome of constant pressure from multiple sides, strategic success results from balanced pressure on your strategy.


Carsten Lund Pedersen is Postdoc at the Department of Strategic Management and Globalization at Copenhagen Business School, where he researches in project-based strategy, employee autonomy and matching employee types with business development projects.

  • amir ahmadi

Whether you are using org chart software such as SmartDraw or some other tool, here are 10 tips to help you build the perfect diagram for your needs.

1. Format the chart to fit on a single page

Use a combination of a horizontal arrangement of boxes at the top of the chart, and vertical below to fit as man

Formatted org chart

y boxes on a single page as possible.

A combination of horizontal and vertical arrangement of boxes fits more boxes on a page.

Using only horizontal arrangements of boxes makes the chart wider.

2. Group people with the same title into one box

Putting all of the people with the same title into one box saves a considerable amount of space compared with assigning each person their own

Multi-person org chart box

 box.

3. Make all boxes the same size and space them evenly

Charts look much better if all of the boxes are the same size (except for multi-person boxes) and the spaces between boxes are the same.

Consistent org chart boxes

Choose organizational chart software that does this automatically.

4. Show assistants with a side bar below the manager

Assistants should be shown with a box that comes off the line that connects the manager to his or her subordinates. This distinguishes the role of the assistant from other people that report to the manager.

5. Put the title of the position first, then the name of

 the person occupying it

The title of the position (the job title) should be shown above the name of the person occupying it because positions define the organizational structure, not the people who currently occupy them. You can change people's

Manager's assistant

Org chart title

You can also hyperlink boxes in the chart to other electronic documents, such as the job description of the position without changing  the structural arrangement of the chart.


Org chart link to resume








.

6. Show managers with two titles as two different boxes in the chart

Particularly in smaller companies, one person may manage multiple parts of the organization. For example in this technology company, the CEO, Paul Smith, also acts as the VP of Engineering. Both the management team and the programmers report to him. The best way to show this is to include both positions in the chart and show Paul as occupying both of them. Remember, the organizational structure is based on positions; not the people that occupy them.

Positional org chart

7. Use dotted lines sparingly

Sometimes it can be helpful to show relationships with a dotted line connecting the boxes of two positions. One common example is an assistant that works for three managers.

Organizational chart showing a dotted line connector

Jane is connected to Toby and Linda by dotted lines because she assists them, as well as Dan. She reports directly to Dan, as shown by the solid line. It's not useful to try and impose the structure of multiple teams on the organization chart with lots of dotted lines. Too many and the chart becomes a mess. To show teams, it's better to use separate charts such as this one.
























8. Draw your chart automatically by importing employee data

The best organizational chart software programs will create your chart automatically. This is accomplished by importing a data file that lists the title of each position, the name of the person assigned to it and the title of their manager in each row. You can create one of these in a spreadsheet program, such as Excel®:

You can use any application, not just Excel, to create a file formatted this way, including PeopleSoft® or SAP R/3®


Create an organizational chart by importing data














9. Create an online version of your chart with hyperlinks to more information

Most people are familiar with printing an organizational chart on paper, but distributing them online can be much more useful. Both let you see the structure of an organization and read the names and titles of the people that work in it, but only an online chart lets you interact with it.

If you want to know who the VP of Sales' assistant is, you can find out from the org chart. With a printed chart if you want to contact her, you can find her name, but then have to look up her email address. With an online chart, her name can be linked directly to her email address, so that clicking on it in initiates an email to her automatically. Positions can also be hyperlinked to other documents, like job descriptions, or even records in the employee database. Your org chart can become a visual interface to more detailed information.








10. Break up large charts in to multiple smaller linked charts

In any format, a very large chart is cumbersome to view. An org chart showing every employee of a large company like GE is impossibly too big and complex to be useful. A more manageable approach is to break the organization up into smaller groups, each with a reasonably-sized org chart, and then link them together. For example, here is GE's top-level organization chart:

Each of the presidents heads up a different company within GE. Their positions can be linked to the org chart for that company. For example, the box for Healthcare links to the org chart for GE Healthcare:

The healthcare chart itself is so large each of these positions links to charts for the CIO's organization, the Business Development organization, and so on. Each sub-chart links back to its parent, so no matter where a reader is in the hierarchy, they can find their way back to the top.

  • amir ahmadi

What makes an effective leader? This question is a focus of my research as an organizational scientist, executive coach, and leadership development consultant. Looking for answers, I recently completed the first round of a study of 195 leaders in 15 countries over 30 global organizations. Participants were asked to choose the 15 most important leadership competencies from a list of 74. I’ve grouped the top ones into five major themes that suggest a set of priorities for leaders and leadership development programs. While some may not surprise you, they’re all difficult to master, in part because improving them requires acting against our natureW160302_GILES_TOPTEN

Demonstrates strong ethics and provides a sense of safety.

This theme

Empowers others to self-organize.

Providing clear direction while allowing employees to organize their own time and work was identified as the next most important leadership competency. combines two of t

No leader can do everything themselves. Therefore, it’s critical to distribute power throughout the organization and to rely on decision making from those who are closest to the action.he three most highly rated attributes: “high ethical and moral standards” (67% selected it as one of the most import

Research has repeatedly shown that empowered teams are more productive and proactive, provide better customer service, and show higher levels of job satisfaction and commitment to their team and organization. And yet many leaders struggle to let people self-organize. They resist because they believe that power is a zero-sum game, they are reluctant to allow others to make mistakes, and they fear facing negative consequences from subordinates’ decisions.

To overcome the fear of relinquishing power, start by increasing awareness of physical tension that arises when you feel your position is being challenged. As discussed above, perceived threats activate a fight, flight, or freeze response in the amygdala. The good news is that we can train our bodies to experience relaxation instead of defensiveness when stress runs high. Try to separate the current situation from the past, share the outcome you fear most with others instead of trying to hold on to control, and remember that giving power up is a great way to increase influence — which builds power over time.ant)

Fosters a sense of connection and belonging.

Leaders who “communicate often and openly” (competency #6) and “create a feeling of succeeding and failing together as a pack” (#8) build a strong foundation for connection.

We are a social species — we want to connect and feel a sense of belonging. From an evolutionary perspective, attachment is important because it improves our chances of survival in a world full of predators. Research suggests that a sense of connection could also impact productivity and emotional well-being. For example, scientists have found that emotions are contagious in the workplace: Employees feel emotionally depleted just by watching unpleasant interactions between coworkers.

From a neuroscience perspective, creating connection is a leader’s second most important job. Once we feel safe (a sensation that is registered in the reptilian brain), we also have to feel cared for (which activates the limbic brain) in order to unleash the full potential of our higher functioning prefrontal cortex.

 and “communicating clear expectations” (56%).There are some simple ways to promote belonging among employees: Smile at people, call them by name, and remember their interests and family members’ names. Pay focused attention when speaking to them, and clearly set the tone of the members of your team having each other’s backs. Using a song, motto, symbol, chant, or ritual that uniquely identifies your team can also strengthen this sense of connection.

Shows openness to new ideas and fosters organizational learning.

What do “flexibility to change opinions” (competency #4), “being open to new ideas and approaches” (#7), and “provides safety for trial and error” (#10) have in common? If a leader has these strengths, they encourage learning; if they don’t, they risk stifling it.

Admitting we’re wrong isn’t easy. Once again, the negative effects of stress on brain function are partly to blame — in this case they impede learning. Researchers have found that reduced blood flow to our brains under threat reduces peripheral vision, ostensibly so we can deal with the immediate danger. For instance, they have observed a significant reduction in athletes’ peripheral vision before competition. While tunnel vision helps athletes focus, it closes the rest of us off to new ideas and approaches. Our opinions are more inflexible even when we’re presented with contradicting evidence, which makes learning almost impossible.

To encourage learning among employees, leaders must first ensure that they are open to learning (and changing course) themselves. Try to approach problem-solving discussions without a specific agenda or outcome. Withhold judgment until everyone has spoken, and let people know that all ideas will be considered. A greater diversity of ideas will emerge.

Failure is required for learning, but our relentless pursuit of results can also discourage employees from taking chances. To resolve this conflict, leaders must create a culture that supports risk-taking. One way of doing this is to use controlled experiments — think A/B testing — that allow for small failures and require rapid feedback and correction. This provides a platform for building collective intelligence so that employees learn from each other’s mistakes, too.

Nurtures growth.

“Being committed to my ongoing training” (competency #5) and “helping me grow into a next-generation leader” (#9) make up the final category.

All living organisms have an innate need to leave copies of their genes. They maximize their offspring’s chances of success by nurturing and teaching them. In turn, those on the receiving end feel a sense of gratitude and loyalty. Think of the people to whom you’re most grateful — parents, teachers, friends, mentors. Chances are, they’ve cared for you or taught you something important.

When leaders show a commitment to our growth, the same primal emotions are tapped. Employees are motivated to reciprocate, expressing their gratitude or loyalty by going the extra mile. While managing through fear generates stress, which impairs higher brain function, the quality of work is vastly different when we are compelled by appreciation. If you want to inspire the best from your team, advocate for them, support their training and promotion, and go to bat to sponsor their important projects.

These five areas present significant challenges to leaders due to the natural responses that are hardwired into us. But with deep self-reflection and a shift in perspective (perhaps aided by a coach), there are also enormous opportunities for improving everyone’s performance by focusing on our own.


Taken together, these attributes are all about creating a safe and trusting environment. A leader with high ethical standards conveys a commitment to fairness, instilling confidence that both they and their employees will honor the rules of the game. Similarly, when leaders clearly communicate their expectations, they avoid blindsiding people and ensure that everyone is on the same page. In a safe environment employees can relax, invoking the brain’s higher capacity for social engagement, innovation, creativity, and ambition.

Neuroscience corroborates this point. When the amygdala registers a threat to our safety, arteries harden and thicken to handle an increased blood flow to our limbs in preparation for a fight-or-flightresponse. In this state, we lose access to the social engagement system of the limbic brain and the executive function of the prefrontal cortex, inhibiting creativity and the drive for excellence. From a neuroscience perspective, making sure that people feel safe on a deep level should be job #1 for leaders.

But how? This competency is all about behaving in a way that is consistent with your values. If you find yourself making decisions that feel at odds with your principles or justifying actions in spite of a nagging sense of discomfort, you probably need to reconnect with your core values. I facilitate a simple exercise with my clients called “Deep Fast Forwarding” to help with this. Envision your funeral and what people say about you in a eulogy. Is it what you want to hear? This exercise will give you a clearer sense of what’s important to you, which will then help guide daily decision making.

To increase feelings of safety, work on communicating with the specific intent of making people feel safe. One way to accomplish this is to acknowledge and neutralize feared results or consequences from the outset. I call this “clearing the air.” For example, you might approach a conversation about a project gone wrong by saying, “I’m not trying to blame you. I just want to understand what happened.”


  • amir ahmadi

In frustrated moments, many professionals long for the independence and income that come with being a consultant or coach. Indeed, the profession can be lucrative, as evinced by famed coach Marshall Goldsmith’s well-publicized rate of $250,000 per client.

But the reality for most coaches and consultants is far different. In fact, the International Coach Federation estimates that globally, coaches’ average annual income is a relatively modest $51,000. Why are most coaches falling short when it comes to building a thriving practice?

For the past decade, I’ve studied the question extensively, both in the course of building my own seven-figure coaching and consulting business, and through my work advising more than 250 professional service providers as part of my Recognized Expert community. I’ve identified three common reasons that nascent practitioners fail. By becoming aware of these traps — and taking action to avoid them — you can ensure you’re well ahead of the competition and are creating a strong foundation for your business.

Reluctance to do low-paid, brand-building activities

Early on, every new coach or consultant has to separate themselves from the crowd — and it is a crowd, with an estimated 53,000+ coachesworldwide, and a 7-10% growth rate of new aspirants per year. The best way is to garner as much social proof (i.e. externally recognized forms of credibility) as possible. Yet many new practitioners, who may be used to the high-level corporate salaries they left behind, are often reluctant to do the free or low-fee, brand-building work that’s necessary in the early days.

One private coaching client of mine scoffed at the $500 honorarium he was offered for a talk, and was thinking of turning it down — before I pointed out that it was for an Ivy League executive ed program, which would enable him to accurately claim on his bio that he had lectured at this prestigious institution, opening doors to other executive education teaching opportunities and providing massive credibility with prospective clients. It’s appropriate to turn down most free or low-paid work — but in the early days of your business, if it will lend you significant brand credibility, it may be worth it.

Unwillingness to reach out to past contacts

For any new coach or consultant (who isn’t a celebrity), there’s only one way to land early clients: your existing network. Outsiders, understandably, will be hesitant to entrust their professional challenges to someone without a track record. But contacts who have known you previously, in a different professional capacity, are often willing to take a chance because they understand your talents will translate into a new realm. And yet many new coaches and consultants — fearing rejection or feeling vulnerable about “asking for business” — hesitate to reach out to the people most likely to become their clients. Instead, they hold out the magical hope that new contacts will suddenly decide to hire them.

In my book Reinventing You, I profiled one executive coach who waited a full two years before notifying the people in her Rolodex about her new profession. She’s since built a very successful business, but only after overcoming this block. It’s understandable that new coaches or consultants don’t want to come on too strong, but sending a personal, low-pressure note (not a blast email, which can easily be ignored) goes a long way toward making your network aware of your new business, so you’ll at least be considered when they make referrals.

For instance, you could shoot them a short message saying hello and inquiring about them, and then add, “I’m excited that I recently started a new business coaching/consulting [insert your ideal client or the topic you focus on]. In case you happen to know anyone who might be a fit for that, I’m always looking for great clients to work with.” You’re not putting them on the spot or demanding referrals, but you are making it clear that you welcome introductions if they feel it’s appropriate. It’s a small but important step that too many new coaches or consultants hesitate to take.

Focusing on your interests, rather than the client’s needs

It’s the most basic principle of entrepreneurship: you can only successfully sell what your client wants to buy. And yet, many professionals  who have longed to start their own coaching or consulting practice have come to view it as their vehicle of creative expression rather than as a business. One nascent coach I worked with was frustrated because she was having trouble landing corporate clients.

She had an impeccable resume, with high-level Fortune 500 jobs and global experience. But the reason for her difficulties soon became clear: her coaching website focused entirely on her interest in spirituality. Many people might value a spiritually-inclined coach, but that messaging didn’t tap into her pre-existing skills and credibility, and actually made it difficult for corporate clients to hire her because she didn’t highlight any business ROI. (An executive who signed off on a contract with her might well face questions about whether it was an appropriate expenditure). Even when we view our practice as a reflection of our innermost self, we have to remain cognizant of what clients are willing to pay for.

Launching a consulting or coaching practice is a coveted goal for many professionals, and the rewards can be substantial. If you avoid the most common mistakes and instead focus on accumulating social proof early on, actively reach out to past colleagues who know you and trust your work, and keep a keen focus on the results that matter to your clients, you have the ability to develop a thriving business and make a greater impact.

  • amir ahmadi

کلیک نمایید

for download the iso standards please click below link

http://cqi360.blog.ir/page/Standards%20contents

  • amir ahmadi